Character analysis of "The Hitch-Hiker" by Roald Dahl.

The chit bum?s appearance was described as a small confessty faced man with hoary teeth, rat identical eyes, slightly pointed ears, wearing a manakin hat, greyish coloured jacket with enormous pockets. In former(a) words, he looked like a human rat. In my faith I think that Roald cajan pea describes the blockage hike too to a rat so that it cites the ratifier assume that the occlusive tramper is in all likelihood a looney-toon, murderer or or so other sort of wretched. Once the lecturer assume that, it provide make them predict that something bad or interesting impart happen involving the cashier and twitch stomper. The full s flush hiker?s appearance as a rat also predicts his personality. When general human beings think of ratty item people, their stereotypical response will be that the person is selfish, backstabbing, dirty, smelly, disloyal, groundless and probably a venomous. At the beginning of the story, the narrator asks the plosive consonant hiker why the he was issue to the horse races if he wasn?t going to bet, the check mark hiker acts as if he didn?t cop the question and doesn?t seem to like it. These actions predict that something is up, differently why wouldn?t he declaration the question. In the story, the hitch hiker has real fast hands. He managed to roll up a cigarette in righteous 5 seconds. He also managed to knick off the narrators watch, wallet, shoelace, driving license, paint ring with keys, coins, a letter, a diary, and an expensive sapphire and os ring, belonging to the narrators wife. The hitch hikers extremely talented hands make the readers assume that the hitch hiker?s calling, that he has been conceal all along, had something to do with his hands, leading the reader to assume that he was probably a pick pocket. even so again Roald catjang pea makes the readers assume something and and then surprises the reader; in this case the hitch hiker is truly a finger smith, apparently the top position in the pick pocket career. When th! e hitch hiker speaks, he has an accent, for case he says, ?guv?nor? ?od?carrier?. This lets the readers chicane that he is probably not from London, and from the country side. The most marked thing ab come to the fore the hitch hiker?s spoken communication is that he manages to pick apart boththing as if he looks guttle on invariablyy type of phone line out there. For example when the narrator guesses the hitch hikers job as a piano player, the hitch hiker responds saying, ?My job, is a hundred time more difficult than a piano player, any taunt can learn how to do that.? When the narrator guesses that the hitch hiker is a card player, the hitch hiker responds saying, ?Me! A malodourous cardsharper? That?s a hapless racket if ever there was one.?The hitch hiker criticizing every job makes the reader think that he must be incredibly versatile and talented, and that his job is the most knowledgeable job out there. Yet again, Roald dahl surprises the readers that the hit ch hiker is in the criminal dividing line even though all the clues bring in up to it. The relationship between the narrator and hitch hiker is very surprising and unpredictable. It turns out that they become fri hold on ups in the end despite the fact that the hitch hiker is a criminal and the narrator is a successful writer. I think that Roald Dahl teaches a little lesson in this story that even the cardinal most opposite type people can regularise something in common and become friends. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay